Форум проектов ISON и LFVN
Общий раздел => Общий раздел => Тема начата: Игорь от Февраль 06, 2008, 16:46:39
-
Dear colleagues,
Please find attached issue 10 of our annual "Classification of geosynchronous
objects" giving the status of all catalogued objects near GEO as of 31 Dec
2007. If you prefer to receive the original postscript file or if you would
like to be taken from the distribution list, please let me know. If you
prefer to have a paper copy sent, please send me your mail address (JC and
Lyubov: you'll get your paper copy anyhow). Any comments or suggestions are
welcome.
Best regards,
Rüdiger Jehn
Space Debris Office
ESOC, Robert Bosch Strasse 5, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany
-
4 TABLE 2: OBJECTS WITHOUT TLES DURING THE LAST 6 MONTHS
4.7 Unidentified objects
In this list there are 146 objects which were observed repeatedly by ground based telescopes but which were not finally correlated to a specific launch (i.e their origin is not determined yet with the required reliability).
The listed orbits are produced from measurements obtained in 2007. They are a joint product of the wide cooperation of organizations including:
• Center on collection, processing and analysis of information on space debris at the Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics of the Russian Academy of Sciences (KIAM RAS, Moscow, Russia),
• International scientific observation facilities network (ISON) coordinated by KIAM RAS and including the following observatories:
– Crimean Astrophysical Observatory (Nauchny and Simeiz facilities, Ukraine),
– Ussuriysk Astrophysical Observatory of the Far East branch of the RAS (Gornotayozhnoye, Russia),
– Ulugbek Astronomical Observatory (Maidanak and Kitab facilities, Uzbekistan),
– National Astronomical Observatory (Abastumani, Georgia),
– National observatory of Bolivia (Tarija),
– Observation facility of the PGU (Tiraspol),
– Observatory of the Institute for Astrophysics of Tajikistan (Gissar),
– Terskol observatory of the Institute for Astronomy of the RAS (INASAN) (North Caucasus, Russia)
– Central (Pulkovo) Astronomical Observatory of the RAS (St.Petersburg, Russia),
– Odessa State University Astronomical Observatory (Mayaki, Ukraine),
– Observation facility of IKIR of the Far East branch of the RAS (Paratunka, Kamchatka peninsula, Russia)
• Astronomical Institute of the University of Bern, partner of the ISON, operating the following facilities:
– Zimmerwald observatory (Switzerland)
– ESOC Teide observatory (Tenerife, Spain)
-
Класификатор доступен по ссылке:
http://lfvn.astronomer.ru/report/0000028/index.htm
-
Вышла в свет 11-я европейская классификация геостационарных объектов
Dear colleagues,
Please find attached issue 11 of our annual "Classification of geosynchronous objects" giving the status of all catalogued objects near GEO as of 31 Dec 2008. If you prefer to receive the original postscript file or if you would like to be taken from the distribution list, please let me know. If you prefer to have a paper copy sent, please send me your mail address (JC and Lyubov: you'll get your paper copy anyhow). Any comments or suggestions are welcome.
Best regards,
Rьdiger Jehn
Space Debris Office
ESOC, Robert Bosch Strasse 5, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany
-
Вот она: http://lfvn.astronomer.ru/report/0000045/index.htm
И традиционно нам там есть благодарность:
4.7. Unidentified objects
The listed orbits are derived from measurements obtained in 2008. They are a joint product of the wide cooperation of organizations including:
Center on collection, processing and analysis of information on space debris at the Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics of the Russian Academy of Sciences (KIAM RAS, Moscow, Russia),
International scientific observation facilities network (ISON) coordinated by KIAM RAS and including the following observatories:
Crimean Astrophysical Observatory (Nauchny and Simeiz facilities, Ukraine),
Ussuriysk Astrophysical Observatory of the Far East branch of the RAS (Gornotayozhnoye, Russia),
Ulugbek Astronomical Observatory (Maidanak and Kitab facilities, Uzbekistan),
National Astronomical Observatory (Abastumani, Georgia),
National observatory of Bolivia (Tarija),
Observation facility of the PGU (Tiraspol),
Observatory of the Institute for Astrophysics of Tajikistan (Gissar),
Terskol observatory of the Institute for Astronomy of the RAS (IN AS AN) (North Caucasus, Russia)
Central (Pulkovo) Astronomical Observatory of the RAS (St.Petersburg, Russia),
Odessa State University Astronomical Observatory (Mayaki, Ukraine),
Observation facility Milkovo (Kamchatka peninsula, Russia)
Astronomical Institute of the University of Bern.
Zimmerwald observatory (Switzerland)
ESOC Teide observatory (Tenerife, Spain)
-
http://www.satobs.org/seesat/Feb-2009/0306.html
ESA REPORT #11
From: Greg Roberts
Date: Sun Feb 15 2009 - 09:47:23 UTC
---------------------------------------------------------
Good morning
Rather a long posting but I hope of interest.
Every year around about February the Space Debris Office of the European Space Operations Centre, run by ESA, releases a report called CLASSIFICATION OF GEOSYNCHRONOUS OBJECTS.
Several years ago the amateur high altitude fratenity adopted the satellites in this report that fall under the UNKNOWN category.
Initially the observation/radio success rate was low as most of these objects are small and thus faint. However as the groups
capabilities have improved so has the success rate so that today probably less than a dozen have still to be located and tracked. In most cases this failure to locate is because we have no observers in certain regions or the satellites may be frequently moved.
Introducing these satellites into the amateur catalog possed a problem since it introduced yet another naming convention. In
an attempt to minimize this once an ESA object had been tracked and its real identity determined, it was added under its correct
name into the catalog. For those objects that could not be associated with any particular launch the number 96*** appears
in the so-called CLASSFD.TLE maintained by the observational amateurs.
Although the element database is called CLASSFD.TLE not all objects are classified. The database is essentially a collection of elements for satellites that are not in the public domain or do not appear in the public SPACETRACK catalog for one or other reason.
The motivation behind the ESA reports are simply to have as complete a representation of what happens in the GEO belt as possible.This area is becoming terribly over crowded and the situation is not improving. There is a real danger posed by objects in this region for which data is not in the public domain or available to satellite operators at a minimum. This was vividly highlighted by the DSP-F23 incident which is not yet over and will present a threat for many years to come, so it is becoming increasingly obvious that one cannot allow the luxury of secret objects in orbit if they present a threat to any other satellite.
Even when satellites are known collisions are inevitable as we have just seen with the IRIDIUM/COSMOS crash. In this case a major slip-up probably occurred as the IRIDIUM satellite should have been able to move to avoid it but since such an incident had not knowingly occurred before vigilance was a little lax. I dont think this will be the case in future., but with "unknown" satellites flying about how does one take evasive action?
Anyway be that as it may....
ESA REPORT #11 has enabled the amateurs to correct several errors as well as add new objects and I believe the summary below is a reasonably accurate representation of the current situation. I suspect there may still be some errors and welcome corrections.
Whilst it has been possibly to provide identities for many of the ESA objects some remain unknown . The ESA report gives a list of objects that are known to have been orbited but have not yet been identified so many of these objects are no doubt present in the ESA catalog of unknown objects. Some of these objects are bright ( brighter than magnitude +12) so are obviously reasonably big objects and probably the main payload, others flash at various rates so could be rocket bodies or other large debri. Many of the objects are small - like telescope dust covers,cooler covers,entry baffle covers,array restraint
cables etc - and are difficult to observe. Typically a 16th magnitude object at geo distance is around 1/2 metre in size. Sometimes the orbital period is also an indication of an operational payload.
In the table below is the current situation for the amateur network and amateur elements,based on amateur observations, are maintained.
The first colum is the amateur designation for an ESA object. ESA use UI001 to represent UNKNOWN OBJECT 001. The amateurs have replaced the UI by 96 so pretty straight forward.
The second column gives the International Designation number
The third column is the COSPAR identification
The fourth column is the amateur designation which has been in use for many years , ie 90 followed by a sequential number
The final column identifies the object, if identity known
========================================================================
96001 26880 01033A 90031 DSP F21 USA 159
96002 not yet observed
96003 90066 05667A 90066 Unknown 050616
96004 26356 00024A 90033 DSP F20 USA 149
96005 observed
96006 observed
96007 26635 00080A 90043 SDS 3F2 USA 155 GREAT BEAR
96008 23223 94054A 90054 MERCURY 1 USA 105
96009 10941 78058A VORTEX 1
96010 observed
96011 observed
96012 observed
96013 27169 02001B MILSTAR 5 r
96014 90049 05605C 90049 Unknown 050415
96015 observed
96016 90048 05605B 90048 Unknown 050415
96017 90030 05544A 90030 Unknown 050213
96018 19976 89035A 90055 VORTEX 6
96019 observed
96020 observed
96021 90008 00838A 90008 Unknown 001203
96022 observed
96023 11558 79086A 90051 VORTEX 2
96024 90075 05605D 90075 Unknown 050415
96025 observed
96026 14675 84009A 90053 VORTEX 4
96027 observed
96028 observed
96029 observed
96030 18583 87097A 90071 DSP F13 USA 28
96031 observed
96032 observed
96033 not yet observed
96034 15453 84129A DSP F12 USA 7
96035 05204 71039A DSP F2
96036 04376 70032A INTELSAT-3F7
96037 14930 84037A 90003 DSP F11
96038 observed
96039 observed
96040 observed
96041 not yet observed
96042 90073 07569A 90073 Unknown 070310
96043 05851 72010A DSP F3
96044 not yet observed
96045 12339 81025A 90050 DSP F9
96046 13086 82019A DSP F10
96047 observed
96048 06691 73040A 90002 DSP F4
96049 observed
96050 observed
96051 90074 06585B 90074 Unknown 060326
96052 08916 76059A 90041 DSP F6
96053 11397 79053A 90069 DSP F8
96054 observed
96055 observed
96056 08482 75118A 90072 DSP F5
96057 09803 77007A 90067 DSP F7
96058 observed
96059 observed
96060 observed
96061 observed
96062 observed
96063 27168 02001A MILSTAR 5 (MILSTAR-2F3 USA 164)
96064 27712 03012B MILSTAR 6 r
96065 25967 99063A 90036 UFO F10 USA 146
96066 22915 93074A 90042 DSCS 3-8 USA 97
96067 not yet observed
96068 23132 94035A UFO F3 USA 104
96069 22787 93056A 90034 UFO F2 USA 95
96070 observed
96071 observed
96072 27938 03041B USA 171 r
96073 23855 96026A 90016 MERCURY 2 USA 118
96074 25336 98029A 90013 MENTOR 2 USA 139
96075 90005 99804A 90005 Unknown 991031
96076 observed
96077 observed
96078 observed
96079 observed
96080 observed
96081 observed
96082 observed
96083 20929 90095A DSP F15 USA 65
96084 observed
96085 observed
96086 not yet observed
96087 not yet observed
96088 observed
96089 observed
96090 90022 04764A 90022 Unknown 040920
96091 observed
96092 20963 90097B 90063 SDS2 F2 USA 67
96093 observed
96094 observed
96095 observed
96096 12046 80087A 90029 FLEETSATCOM 4
96097 15543 85010B 90037 MAGNUM 1 USA 8
96098 11890 80060A EKRAN 5
96099 not yet observed
96100 not yet observed
96101 10669 78016A FLEETSATCOM 1
96102 observed
96103 observed
96104 DSCS 3-11
96105 26575 00065A DSCS 3-12 USA 153
96106 27691 03008A 90035 DSCS 3-13 USA 167
96107 27875 03040A 90024 DSCS 3-14 USA 170
96108 28158 04004A DSP F22
96109 27711 03012A MILSTAR 6 (MILSTAR-2F4) USA 169
96110 not yet observed
96111 25258 98016A UFO F8 USA 138
96112 26715 01009A MILSTAR 4 (MILSTAR-2F3) USA 157
96113 25501 98058A UFO F9 USA 140
96114 GEOLITE ? not yet observed
96115 DSCS ? not yet observed
96116 23967 96042A UFO F7 USA 127
96117 28117 03057A 90038 UFO F11 USA 174
96118 27937 03041A MENTOR 3 USA 171
96119 not yet observed
96120 DSCS 3-F7
96121 23467 95003A UFO F4 USA 108
96122 23589 95027A 90009 UFO F5 USA 111
96123 DSCS 3-F6
96124 23712 95060A MILSTAR 2 (MILSTAR DFS-2) USA 115
96125 24737 97008A DSP F18 USA 130
96126 observed
96127 not yet observed
96128 23567 95022A MENTOR 1
96129 12930 81107A VORTEX 3
96130 20253 89077A FLEETSATCOM 8 USA 46
96131 not yet observed
96132 observed
96133 21805 91080B 90068 DSP F16 USA 75
96134 FLTSATCOM-7
96135 13637 82106B DSCS 3-F1
96136 20355 89090B MAGNUM 2 USA 48
96137 observed
96138 not yet observed
96139 90007 00653A 90007 Unknown 080229
96140 29242 06024C 90078 MiTEx U/S r USA 189
96141 32287 07054A DSP F23 USA 197
96142 22988 94009A 90023 MILSTAR 1 (MILSTAR DFS-1) USA 99
96143 not yet observed
96144 observed
96145 observed
96146 90076 07761A 90076 Unknown 070918
96147 32288 07054B USA 197 r
96148 not yet observed
96149 not yet observed
96150 not yet observed
96151 01046A SDS 3-F3 USA 162
96152 07046A WGS-F1 USA 195
As Bugs Bunny (I think?) used to say "Thas all Folks!"
Cheers
Greg
-
Несколько замечаний в результате беглого просмотра 11-го издания.
1. Неудачно сформулирован Abstract. Он начинается с заявления, что TLE имеются для 970 околостационарных объектов, однако при внимательном чтении выясняется, что для шести из них в действительности элементов давно уже нет и что на самом деле они перечислены не в разделе 3, а в разделе 4.
2. Объект U.56 (GOES-7 AKM) ошибочно классифицирован как Debris (стр. 99);
3. Как и ранее, взаимоотношения между таблицами объектов без TLE (управляемыми и неуправляемыми) и таблицами "неидентифицированных" объектов UI остаются темными. Вполне можно было бы прямо написать, что 38 спутников и одна ступень из тех, для которых не выдаются TLE, входят в число 152 объектов типа UI, и дать таблицу соответствия.
-
thanks for putting the document in the internet. And also thanks for your comments. From the 970 objects with TLEs, 964 have recent TLEs and 6 have obsolete TLEs. I am already discussing with Vladimir about a new format for objects without recent TLEs. Next years' issue will probably look different. And yes the GOES 7 AKM must be classified as rocket body. Spasiba for your help!
-
Вышла в свет 12-я классификация геостационарных объектов. Кому нужно - пишите, перешлю.
Dear colleagues,
Please find attached issue 12 of our annual report "Classification of
geosynchronous objects" giving the status of all catalogued objects near GEO
as of 31 Dec 2009. If you would like to be taken from the distribution list,
please let me know. If you prefer to have a paper copy sent, please send me
your mail address (JC and Lyubov: you'll get your paper copy anyhow). Any
comments or suggestions are welcome.
Best regards,
Rüdiger Jehn
Space Debris Office
ESOC, Robert Bosch Strasse 5, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany
Там есть и такие слова:
The listed orbits are produced from measurements obtained in 2009. They are a joint product of the
wide cooperation of organizations including:
• Center on collection, processing and analysis of information on space debris at the Keldysh Institute
of Applied Mathematics of the Russian Academy of Sciences (KIAM RAS, Moscow, Russia),
• International scientific observation facilities network (ISON) coordinated by KIAM RAS and including
the following observatories:
– Crimean Astrophysical Observatory (Nauchny and Simeiz facilities, Ukraine),
– Ussuriysk Astrophysical Observatory of the Far East branch of the RAS (Gornotayozhnoye,
Russia),
– Terskol observatory of the Institute for Astronomy of the RAS (INASAN) (North Caucasus,
Russia),
– Ulugbek Astronomical Observatory (Kitab facilitiy, Uzbekistan),
– Observation facilities operated by ”NPP ”Proekt-tekhnika”, JSC:
∗ Blagoveshchensk (Amur region, Russia),
∗ Milkovo (Kamchatka peninsula, Russia),
∗ Artem (Primorsky region, Russia),
– Andrushivka Observatory (Ukraine),
– National Astronomical Observatory (Abastumani, Georgia),
– National observatory of Bolivia (Tarija),
– Observation facility of the PGU (Tiraspol),
– Observatory of the Institute for Astrophysics of Tajikistan (Gissar),
– Odessa State University Astronomical Observatory (Mayaki, Ukraine),
– Central (Pulkovo) Astronomical Observatory of the RAS (St.Petersburg, Russia),
• Joint Italian-Russian telescope FIRST at Collepardo observation facility (Italy)
-
Вышла в свет 12-я классификация геостационарных объектов
Вот она:
http://lfvn.astronomer.ru/files/COGO-issue12.pdf
-
http://satobs.org/seesat/Feb-2010/0009.html
I have newly correlated 67 objects classified as UI (unidentified) in Classification of Geosynchronous Objects (COGO), Issue 11, and identified them as a specific piece from their launch. Corrections of 5 previous independent identifications are proposed. This increases the total number of identified objects to 140, out of 152 originally reported as unidentified.
My report is available here:
http://satobs.org/seesat_ref/IDCOGO11/Identification_of_UI_Objects_in_COGO_11.pdf
The proposed changes to the IDs we use are summarized here:
http://satobs.org/seesat_ref/IDCOGO11/GEO_ID_Change_Report.pdf
Drafts of my findings have been circulated with key observers and analysts over the past couple of weeks. I believe that the emerging consensus is that we will wait for COGO 12 to appear (typically around February), and see what new identifications the experts propose, reconcile any differences with this study, and then switch to the adopted IDs at a time mutually convenient.
Corrections and suggestions to identify remaining UI objects are welcome.
Ted Molczan
-
Final issue geoclass report, issue 13
http://lfvn.astronomer.ru/files/ESAclassificationIssue13.pdf
CLASSIFICATION OF GEOSYNCHRONOUS OBJECTS. ISSUE 13.
by T. Flohrer, R. Choc, and B. Bastida
February 2011 ESOC Robert-Bosch-Str. 5, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany
На стр. 103-104 там отмечено:
4 Table 2: Objects without Two-Line-Element data
The listed orbits are produced from measurements obtained in 2010. They are a joint product of the
wide cooperation of organizations including:
• Center on collection, processing and analysis of information on space debris at the Keldysh Institute
of Applied Mathematics of the Russian Academy of Sciences (KIAM RAS, Moscow, Russia),
• International scientific observation facilities network (ISON) coordinated by KIAM RAS and including
the following observatories:
– Crimean Astrophysical Observatory (Nauchny and Simeiz facilities, Ukraine),
– Ussuriysk Astrophysical Observatory of the Far East branch of the RAS (Gornotayozhnoye,
Russia),
– Terskol observatory of the Institute for Astronomy of the RAS (INASAN) (North Caucasus,
Russia),
– Ulugbek Astronomical Observatory (Kitab facilitiy, Uzbekistan),
– Observation facilities operated by "NPP "Proekt-tekhnika", JSC:
∗ Blagoveshchensk (Amur region, Russia),
∗ Milkovo (Kamchatka peninsula, Russia),
∗ Artem (Primorsky region, Russia),
– Andrushivka Observatory (Ukraine),
– National Astronomical Observatory (Abastumani, Georgia),
– National observatory of Bolivia (Tarija),
– Observation facility of the PGU (Tiraspol),
– Observatory of the Institute for Astrophysics of Tajikistan (Gissar),
– Odessa State University Astronomical Observatory (Mayaki, Ukraine),
– Central (Pulkovo) Astronomical Observatory of the RAS (St.Petersburg, Russia),
• Astronomical Institute of the University of Bern, partner of ISON, operating the Zimmerwald
observatory (Switzerland) and, for space debris observation, the ESA 1 m telescope at the optical
ground station (OGS), Izaña, Tenerife, Spain.
• Joint Italian-Russian telescope FIRST at Collepardo observation facility (Italy)
-
C форума новостей космонавтики:
Если кто не заметил пока, то в новом выпуске классификатора среди прочего отождествлены 3 объекта, которые, как оказалось, к секретным никакого отношения не имеют :). А именно:
Бриз-М из запуска 2008-006 - так и не каталогизирован (пока) американцами (ранее в классификаторе числился как UI153)
Бриз-М из запуска 2010-006 - с каталогизацией тоже, видать, есть проблемки
PAS 6 (1997-040A) (ранее в классификаторе - UI094), потерянный немедленно после увода на орбиту захоронения в апреле 2004 г. Единственный набор TLE, имеющийся для орбиты увода, насколько мне известно, сформирован по данным от операторов КА, а не по реальным наблюдениям американской СККП. В этом причина долгого "не отождествления": период и наклонение в TLE довольно грубые.
Объект, который в итоге отождествлен с PAS 6, наблюдается с 12.04.2004.
-
Вышел 14-й выпуск классификации:
http://astronomer.ru/images/89/COGO14.pdf
-
Вышел 15-й выпуск классификатора: http://astronomer.ru/data/0128/ESAclassification_Issue15.pdf
-
Here's the lastest issue of Classification of Geosynchronous Objects.
http://www.astrobrock.com/ESA/ESAclassification_Issue15_.pdf
The past issue's, ie 12,13 and 14 are available
http://www.astrobrock.com/ESA/
Kevin
-
Кевин Феттер на Seesat-L:
http://www.astrobrock.com/ESA/ESAclassification_Issue16_.pdf
-
Причём, хоть бы раз получили от автора, а не от Феттера :(.
-
Жаль, вклад Грега остался за кадром :)...:
-
CLASSIFICATION OF GEOSYNCHRONOUS OBJECTS
Prepared by T. Flohrer
Issue 17
Date of Issue 28 March 2015
http://astronomer.ru/data/0128/ESAclassification_Issue17.pdf
На стр. 128
4 Table 2: Objects without Two-Line-Element data
The listed orbits are produced from measurements obtained in 2014. They are a joint product of the wide cooperation of organizations including:
• Center on collection, processing and analysis of information on space debris at the Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics of the Russian Academy of Sciences (KIAM RAS, Moscow, Russia),
• International scientific observation facilities network (ISON) coordinated by KIAM RAS and including the following observatories:
– Ussuriysk Astrophysical Observatory of the Far East branch of the RAS (Gornotayozhnoye, Primorsky Krai, Russia),
– Zvenigorod observatory of the Astronomy Institute of the RAS (INASAN) (Moscow oblast, Russia),
– Crimean Astrophysical Observatory (Nauchny),
– Ulugbek Astronomical Observatory (Kitab facilitiy, Qashqadaryo Province, Uzbekistan),
– Observation facilities operated by the ”Astronomical Scientific Center”, JSC:
∗ Artem (Primorsky Krai, Russia),
∗ Blagoveshchensk (Amur region, Russia),
∗ Kislovodsk observatory (Karachaevo-Cherkesskaya Republic, Russia),
∗ Lesosibirsk (Krasnoyarsky Krai, Russia),
∗ Milkovo (Kamchatka Krai, Russia),
– Byurakan Astrophysical Observatory of the Armenian Academy of Sciences (Byurakan, Armenia),
– Andrushivka Observatory (Zhytomyrs’ka oblast, Ukraine),
– National observatory of Bolivia (Tarija, Bolivia),
– Sayan Solar Observatory of the Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics of the Siberian branch of the RAS (Mondy, Republic of Buryatia, Russia),
– Observation facility of the PGU (Tiraspol),
– Odessa State University Astronomical Observatory (Mayaki, Odes’ka oblast, Ukraine),
– Chuguyev observation facility of the Astronomy scientific and research institute of Kharkov national university (Kharkiv’ska oblast, Ukraine),
– Cosala observation facility of the The Autonomous University of Sinaloa (Universidad Autуnoma de Sinaloa, UAS, Mexico),
– Khureltogoot observatory of the The Research Centre of Astronomy and Geophysics of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences
• Astronomical Institute of the University of Bern, partner of ISON, operating the Zimmerwald observatory (Switzerland) and, for space debris observation, the ESA 1m telescope at the optical ground station (OGS), Izaсa, Tenerife, Spain,
• Telescope Fabra ROA Montsec (TFRM) operated by the Reial Acadиmia de Ciиncies i Arts de Barcelona - Observatori Fabra, the Real Instituto y Observatorio de la Armada (ROA) and the Departament d’Astronomia i Meteorologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.