Форум проектов ISON и LFVN
Общий раздел => Общий раздел => Тема начата: Игорь от Март 02, 2008, 18:25:02
-
Аллен Томсон из SeeSat-L обнаружил роль сети ПулКОН/ISON в составлении Европейского каталога.
Грег Робертс в ответ разъяснил, что европейским обозначениям UInnn соответствуют любительские 96nnn и добавил:
I wonder if the Russian/ESA observers made use of CLASSIFIED.TLE as we were observing several geo objects quite some time before they appeared in the ESA reports :))
http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1636&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=2400
-
http://www.satobs.org/seesat/Mar-2008/0011.html
Russian / ESA GEO monitoring reports
From: Allen Thomson (thomsona@flash.net)
Date: Sat Mar 01 2008 - 23:36:47 UTC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quite serendipitously, I happened on what appears to be a fairly
serious Russian / ESA effort to monitor GEO and other high-altitude
objects. The reports resulting from this activity contain some
information about the objects that might be of interest to other
observers and analysts.
Former SeeSat poster Vladimir Agapov of the Keldysh Institute in Moscow
appears to be playing an important role.
Description:
www.unoosa.org/pdf/pres/stsc2007/tech-31.pdf
www.cdi.org/pdfs/Jehn.pdf
Reports:
lfvn.astronomer.ru/report/circular/index.htm
lfvn.astronomer.ru/report/circular/index2.htm
lfvn.astronomer.ru/report/circular/index3.htm
lfvn.astronomer.ru/report/circular/index4.htm
lfvn.astronomer.ru/report/0000009/index.htm
lfvn.astronomer.ru/report/0000011/index.htm
lfvn.astronomer.ru/report/0000019/index.htm
-
http://www.satobs.org/seesat/Mar-2008/0018.html
Re: Russian / ESA GEO monitoring reports
From: Igor Lissov (lissov-i@yandex.ru)
Date: Sun Mar 02 2008 - 11:08:26 UTC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
> Description:
>
> www.unoosa.org/pdf/pres/stsc2007/tech-31.pdf
> www.cdi.org/pdfs/Jehn.pdf
More recent report on the ISON network may be found at
http://www.unoosa.org/pdf/pres/stsc2008/tech-28E.pdf
As far as I understand, apart from fielding a full-GEO
monitoring network the cooperation made significant
progress in identification of old TLE-less GEO
objects as well as in the research of the behavior of
high area-to-mass debris in the GEO region.
By the way, Mr Nicholas Johnson presented a report
named Space Debris Assessment for USA-193
at the same conference:
http://www.unoosa.org/pdf/pres/stsc2008/tech-16.pdf
The full list of presentations is at
http://www.unoosa.org/oosa/COPUOS/stsc/2008/presentations.html
Igor Lissov
-
http://www.satobs.org/seesat/Mar-2008/0013.html
Re:Russian/ESA Geo monitoring Reports
From: Greg Roberts (grr@telkomsa.net)
Date: Sun Mar 02 2008 - 05:59:49 UTC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Allen
Many thanks for your note re the above subject and for the
first two URL's-- dont have those so will get.
Yes the Russians and ESA are doing a fine job of monitoring
unpublished geo objects not found in the SPACETRACK lists-
the latest report (ESA#10) is what I am currently using to
observe the 96*** objects I am currently reporting to SeeSat.
In the ESA report they are identified with UI*** numbers so
replace the UI*** with 96*** and they are the same objects.
Using this report I have been able to identify many of the
90*** objects that appear in Mike McCants CLASSIFIED.TLE
with their true identities - a simple task anyone could have done.
Hopefully the known 90*** objects will now appear in the so
called CLASSIFIED.TLE element set under their true identity.
Observed 96*** objects that have no obvious match will appear
as 96*** objects in the element sets whilst unidentified 90***
objects will remain as such. I understand Mike is working on
implementing the new naming scheme.
I should mention that quite a few of the true identities were
established by several radio observers and brief mention of
this is made in the ESA#10 report.
I wonder if the Russian/ESA observers made use of
CLASSIFIED.TLE as we were observing several geo objects
quite some time before they appeared in the ESA reports :-))
Exciting times...
Cheers
Greg
-
ESA REPORT#10 matches
From: Greg Roberts (grr@telkomsa.net)
Date: Tue Mar 04 2008 - 08:23:18 UTC
Good morning
Ive had a few queries about the matches to satellites of objects mentioned in the ESA REPORT#10 and, from information that can be found on the internet with a little searching, Ive compiled the following table. Maybe it will inspire others to observe these objects. I cannot claim any originality in these identifications and would welcome comments/corrections.
Cheers
Greg
PROVISIONAL MATCHES ESA#10
-------------------------------------------
Column headings:
1 ESA Number
2 ESA Number inclination degrees
3 ESA Number period -revs/day
4 CLASSIFIED.TLE number --- XXXXXX when not in CLASSIFIED.TLE
5 ClASSIFIED.TLE inclination degrees
6 CLASSIFIED.TLE period - revs/day
7 Common name
8 COSPAR identifcation
9 SPACETRACK catalog number
001 02.9442 1.00265 #90031 02.9133 1.00270 DSP F21 USA-159 01033A #26880
002 03.9495 1.00745
003 03.7271 1.00450 #90066 03.7182 1.00451 CENTAUR ROCKET
004 03.9751 1.00280 #90033 03.9395 1.00270 DSP F-20 USA-149 00024A #26356
005 04.1929 0.99714
006 04.3851 1.01115
007 02.0305 1.00270 #90043 02.0376 1.00270 SDS 3F2 USA-155 00080A #26635
008 04.4371 1.OO261 #90054 04.3207 1.00270 MERCURY 1 94054A #23223
009 02.7905 1.00104
010 02.6976 0.99626
011 06.4384 1.01178
012 02.9277 1.03856
013 01.9841 1.00210 #27169 01.9632 1.00213 MILSTAR 5 CNR 02001B #27169
014 05.1135 1.00583 #90049 05.1635 1.00596
015 06.9505 1.01178
016 07.3422 1.00580 #90048 07.3743 1.00589
017 07.5166 0.99579 #90030 07.4203 0.99576
018 05.5286 1.00250 #90055 05.5002 1.00270 CHALET?VORTEX?
019 08.3049 1.01179
020 05.9640 0.99428
021 08.7569 1.00558 #90008 08.6517 1.00544
022 09.7087 1.01265
023 06.7863 1.00204
024 07.0009 0.99683 #90075 07.0051 0.99680
025 07.6411 0.99439
026 07.6613 1.00274 #90053 07.6617 1.00270 VORTEX?
027 08.9471 1.00314
028 10.5333 1.02118
029 10.5980 1.01239
030 10.9626 0.98388 #90071 10.9556 0.98390 DSP F13 87097A #18583
031 08.8550 1.01907
032 13.3505 1.01153
033 13.4108 1.01080
034 13.7745 0.98858 XXXXXX 13.3107 0.98857 DSP F12 84129A #15453
035 10.8872 1.00278 XXXXXX 11.3468 1.00274 DSP F2 ?? 71039A #05204
036 10.9487 1.00204
037 13.9593 0.98679 #90003 13.9544 0.98681 DSP F11 84037A #14930
038 11.5738 1.00667
039 13.7891 1.01252
040 13.6329 1.01331
041 13.8434 1.00274
042 12.1666 0.98151 #90073 12.1764 0.98154 DSP?
043 12.3971 1.00270 XXXXXX 12.7112 1.00272 DSP F3 72010A #05851
044 14.1333 1.00250
045 14.3518 0.98829 #90050 14.3160 0.98822 DSP F9 81025A #12339
046 14.6015 0.98190 XXXXXX 14.3306 0.98191 DSP F10 82019A #13086
047 15.5195 1.00808
048 13.0385 0.99827 #90002 13.0852 0.99808 DSP F4 73040A #06691
049 13.1914 0.99563
050 13.6015 1.00547
051 14.6800 0.99440 #90074 14.5174 0.99416
052 13.6525 1.00466
053 14.8277 0.98741 XXXXXX 14.8354 0.98739 DSP F8 79053A #11397
054 13.8532 1.00544
055 14.6592 1.01772
056 14.2778 0.99467 #90072 14.2829 0.99468 DSP F5 75118A #08482
057 14.8122 0.97530 #90067 14.8187 0.97530 DSP F7 77007A #09803
058 16.7850 0.94327
059 20.0733 1.02317
060 21.2761 1.00162
061 02.9637 0.99902
062 00.7878 0.99821
063 01.7619 1.00271 #27168 01.7393 1.00270 MILSTAR 5 USA-164 02001A #27168
064 01.5263 1.00589 #27712 01.5065 1.00590 MILSTAR 6 CNR 03012B #27712
065 01.6079 1.00271 #90036 01.6315 1.00270 UFO F10 USA-146 99063A #25967
066 03.8358 1.00270 #90042 03.8261 1.00270 DSCS III-8 USA-97 93074A #22915
067 04.0202 0.99711
068 05.0641 1.00228 XXXXXX 04.9474 1.00217 UFO F3 94035A #23132
069 05.3915 1.00270 #90034 05.3927 1.00270 UFO F2 USA-95 93056A #22787
070 02.6320 1.00373
071 06.5415 0.99493
072 04.0967 1.00843 XXXXXX 04.9474 1.00270 UFO 3?? 03041B #27938
073 07.3097 1.00267 #90016 07.2885 1.00275 MERCURY 2 96026A #23855
074 07.5028 1.00271 #90013 07.5016 1.00270 ORION/MENTOR5 98029A #25336
075 08.2732 0.99563 #90005 08.2788 0.99565 CENTAUR
076 07.7810 0.99605
077 10.0005 0.99318
078 10.1085 1.01278
079 10.2679 0.98989
080 10.3127 1.01302
081 10.6883 0.99910
082 09.7186 1.02333
083 10.7188 0.98391 XXXXXX 10.0070 0.98397 DSP F15? 90095A #20929
084 10.8499 0.99250
085 10.9886 1.01642
086 10.2247 1.00285
087 11.6851 0.98797
088 11.7678 1.01245
089 09.7533 1.00712
090 12.8671 0.99515 #90022 12.6937 0.99516
091 11.0213 1.00482
092 12.6956 1.00268 #90063 12.3782 1.00270 SDS 2F2(SDS B-2) 90097B #20963
093 11.1230 1.00394
094 12.8347 0.93696
095 13.2771 1.01164
096 14.3268 0.98949 #90029 14.3068 0.98958 FLSATCOM 4 80087A #12046
097 15.4997 1.00269 #90037 15.4966 1.00270 MAGNUM 1 85010B #15543
098 14.5385 1.00199
099 NO SATELLITE
100 14.2353 1.00600
101 15.2516 0.99001
102 15.2993 0.99234
103 20.7216 1.02090
104 00.0469 1.00270 DSCS?
105 00.0482 1.00264 XXXXXX 05.0525 1.00269 DSCS III-12 USA-153 00065A #26575
106 00.0689 1.00270 #90035 00.0700 1.00270 DSCS III-13 USA-167 03008A #27691
107 00.0693 1.00255 XXXXXX 00.0405 1.00268 DSCS III-14 USA-170 03040A #27875
108 00.7717 1.00260 XXXXXX DSP F22 USA-176 04004A #28158
109 00.2298 1.00263 #27711 00.2502 1.00270 MILSTAR 6 03012A #27711
110 NO SATELLITE
111 02.0261 1.00261 XXXXXX 01.9575 1.00268 UFO F8 USA-138 98016A #25258
112 02.1595 1.00267 XXXXXX 02.0693 1.00270 MILSTAR 4 01009A #26715
113 02.4243 0.98178 XXXXXX 02.3585 0.98180 UFO F9 98058A #25501
114 02.2009 1.00266 GeoLITE?
115 03.4379 1.00266 DSCS?
116 03.3105 1.00277 #23967 03.3987 1.00270 UFO F7 USA-127 96042A #23967
117 02.4098 1.00269 #90038 02.3704 1.00270 UFO F11 USA-174 03057A #28117
118 03.0356 1.00264 ADVANCED ORION-3?
119 03.6628 1.00267 XXXXXX 03.5739 1.00271 UFO F6 USA-114 95057A #23696
120 04.0388 1.00266 XXXXXX 03.9015 1.00274 DSCS III-7 93046A #22719
121 04.0414 1.00277 XXXXXX 03.9273 1.00269 UFO F4 USA-108 95003A #23467
122 04.3500 1.00260 XXXXXX 04.3500 1.00260 UFO F5 USA-111 95027A #23589
123 05.2423 1.00268 XXXXXX 05.1416 1.00273 DSCS III-6 92073A #22009
124 NO SATELLITE
125 06.4649 1.00265 DSP F18?
126 06.6190 0.99115
127 06.9875 0.99035
128 07.2907 1.00267 ADVANCED ORION-1?
129 07.2457 1.00236 #90056 07.2349 1.00251 VORTEX?
130 08.1145 1.00264 XXXXXX 08.0329 1.00267 FLTSATCOM 8 89077A #20253
131 NO SATELLITE
132 08.7766 1.10776
133 10.2457 1.00270 #90068 10.2260 1.00270 DSP F16 USA-75 91080B #21805
134 10.7441 1.00270 XXXXXX 10.6689 1.00267 FLTSATCOM 7 89069A #17181
135 12.1422 0.98676
136 12.7973 1.00265 MAGNUM 2?
137 14.4767 1.00382
138 20.7212 1.00285
139 11.1498 1.00247
140 01.1799 1.04002 #90078 01.2087 1.04002 MiTEX launch 06024A #29240
141 03.7990 1.00690 XXXXXX 03.7832 1.00690 DSP F23 07054A #32287
142 05.5675 1.00266 #90023 05.5347 1.00270 MILSTAR DFS1 94009A #22988
143 10.9000 0.99302
144 12.0105 0.99779
145 18.6473 1.01706
146 18.7777 1.00173 #90076 18.7840 1.00180
147 04.2147 0.95871 XXXXXX 04.2147 0.95871 DSP F23 R 07054B #32288
Comments:
----------
(1) As can be seen there are quite a few major objects - denoted by XXXXXX in the 4th column which are not in CLASSIFIED.TLE. I personally feel that these objects should be observed and added .They are not difficult objects.
(2) Whilst Peter Wakelin and myself are doing a good job of keeping tabs on high altitude satellites in our trackable area, a large number of the above objects are below our horizon. It is unfortunate that no serious amateur effort is made from anywhere else to observe these objects - many of the objects are in drifting orbits which mean that in the course of time they will do a complete trip around the Clarke belt, so whilst out of range to Peter or myself they are not tracked. Is it too much of a challenge for other observers :-))
-
ESA#10 report
From: Greg Roberts (grr@telkomsa.net)
Date: Tue Mar 04 2008 - 16:21:22 UTC
Hi all
It would appear that not all know where the ESA REPORT #10 may be found -- here is the url
http://lfvn.astronomer.ru/main/english.htm
copies of previous years reports may also be found on this site.
Some of the papers available for download may also be of interest to some observers.
Cheers
Greg
-
http://www.satobs.org/seesat/Apr-2008/0011.html
From: Ed Cannon
Date: Wed Apr 02 2008 - 05:09:55 UTC
For those who may be interested, here are some possibly
new bibliographic items (at least some of them).
Rogers, Lucy. It's ONLY Rocket Science (Chapter 9
covers the topic of observing satellites.) --
http://www.itsonlyrocketscience.com/index.html
Same book on Springerlink --
http://www.springerlink.com/content/978-0-387-75378-2
I don't think I've seen the next one listed here.
Proceedings of the Sixth US/Russian Space Surveillance
Workshop, August 22-26, 2005.
The session titles are:
SESSION 1. Space Surveillance Systems & Operations
SESSION 2. Orbital Debris
SESSION 3. Space Surveillance A
SESSION 4. Atmospheric Density
SESSION 5. Orbit Determination
SESSION 6. Optical Systems and Observations
SESSION 7. Space Surveillance B
SESSION 8. Deep Space
Each session included two to five presentations. Many
of them appear to be on-topic for SeeSat-L (generally
pretty advanced, no doubt). Here's the link:
http://lfvn.astronomer.ru/report/0000015/index.htm
A while back Allen Thomson provided a list from the
same site:
http://www.satobs.org/seesat/Mar-2008/0011.html
I looked that up because I stumbled upon the following
addition to the list, as of February 2008:
"CLASSIFICATION OF GEOSYNCHRONOUS OBJECTS. ISSUE 10" --
http://lfvn.astronomer.ru/report/0000028/index.htm
Here are more titles, all regarding geosats (with a
few highly eccentric ones included occasionally). As
Allen mentioned, Vladimir Agapov is involved in many
if not all of them:
"Faint GEO objects search and orbital analysis" --
http://lfvn.astronomer.ru/report/0000003/p000003.htm
"Joint RAS/PIMS/AIUB GEO survey results" (cooperative
survey of satellites in the geostationary belt area) --
http://lfvn.astronomer.ru/report/0000005/p000005.htm
"Results of GEO region artificial objects population
research and proposal for organization of cooperative
international GEO space debris monitoring" --
http://lfvn.astronomer.ru/report/0000020/en_index.htm
"International scientific optical network for space
debris research" --
http://lfvn.astronomer.ru/report/0000012/p000012.htm
"On orbital evolution of explosion fragments" --
http://lfvn.astronomer.ru/report/0000013/p000013.htm
If you can read Russian, there are a lot more titles
on this page:
http://lfvn.astronomer.ru/main/report.htm
Public aside to list administrator: Ted, Thank
you very much for your message working on the
identification of the re-entered object found in
Australia!
Ed Cannon - Austin, Texas, USA
-
Вот, нас обсуждают еще и здесь, на Aliens & UFOs discussion forum:
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread356920/pg1
http://lucianarchy.proboards21.com/index.cgi?board=unitednations&action=display&thread=2468&page=137
The UN Meeting of February 2008 revisited - ISON
Topic started on 20-5-2008 @ 08:27 PM by Shere Khaan
The thing that blew me away and suddenly makes this all believable was the section on space debris and the reference in the minutes of the overall committee to a Russian organisation called ISON. This stands for the International scientific optical observation network
The above page I linked shows the report of their first years work which was presented at the Vienna meetings where the alleged UN UFO meeting took place. Now I am jumping to conclusions here on my little mat, but if any organisation is going to be able to identify and prove the existence of the UFO phenomenon surely it will be the one tracking all the other objects to discount them? Here is a quote from their conclusion.
So while no evidence of the UN meeting has come to light, there are certainly some very interesting projects going on in the UN that skirt this issue and coincide with the UN leak. Most everyone here believes in the UFO phenomenon, so the activities of these committees will definitely come across and hopefully be able to track the phenomenon like never before. This is one organisation that I will put on my watch list!
reply posted on 21-5-2008 @ 05:43 PM by Shere Khaan
If you believe in UFO's then these guys definitely know about them since they can see low earth objects down to 2mm with radar and also very feint objects right up to high earth orbit. The fact that the UN meeting coincides with the FIRST EVER REPORT by ISON tells me that they found smoething that needed dealing with and backs it up much better than Lorant's testimony.
http://www.realufos.net/2008/05/un-meeting-on-ufos-february-2008.html
Wednesday, May 21, 2008
THE UN Meeting on Ufo's February 2008 ?
Hey guys you have probably heard that United Nations held a general assembly back in February this year to discuss a meeting on the 'Peaceful Uses of Outer Space'.
Although Nick Pope says in the above doco that nothing of interest happened in the meeting a recent release of documents from the scientific subcommittee does indicate that in fact the UN is highly interested in whats going on in space. Below is a startling summary of the forty-fifth session held in Vienna on the 11th of February to the 22nd 2008 tying in nicely with the alleged dates of the meetings covering UFO topics amongst other things.
Of Interest is the section on space debris and the reference in the minutes of the overall committee to a Russian organisation called ISON. This stands for the International scientific optical observation network and was developed with the following goals:
*estimation of real population of artificial objects on high geocentric orbits
*determining of possible origin of the discovered objects
*verification of existed space debris distribution and evolution models for high orbits (GEO, HEO, MEO)
*estimation of the real level of danger caused by space debris fragments for operational spacecrafts on high orbits at present and in the future
*testing and improvement of the technology of space debris studies using optical instruments
*improvement of the motion models for measurements processing and orbit propagation of specific space debris objects with high AMR
-
Вот еще про нас рассуждают на другом форуме:
http://groups.google.com.by/group/sci.geo.geology/browse_thread/thread/3324349a108d61b7
Belba Grubb View profile Translated (View Original)
Дополнительные параметры 13 фев, 17:09
Группы новостей: sci.geo.geology
Автор: Belba Grubb <trungsister...@yahoo.com>
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:09:35 -0800 (PST)
I tried to find the post where Skywise mentioned being in a group that
watches satellites, because I'd promised to post the link the article
I'd read about similar groups. I found that link, but now I can't find
the post. Sigh. It's a big universe.
Anyway, StrategyPage is where the article was and they reworked the
old one into a new article recently to cover the collision over Russia
this past Wednesday. It was ISON I was thinking of:
/There are lots of people keeping an eye on this clutter. The U.S. Air
Force Space Surveillance Network, which tracks nearly 18,000 objects
10mm and larger, stopped sharing all of its information five years
ago, for national security reasons. The Russian Space Surveillance
System is known to use radar to track over 5,000 objects in low orbit.
But the Russians have never shared this data completely, or regularly.
Filling in the gaps are two international organizations; IADC (Inter-
Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee) and ISON (International
Space Observation Network). IADC is a government operation, whose
members include the U.S. NASA, and the equivalents in Russia, China
and several other major nations. Like most government organizations,
not all data is shared.
ISON is a non-government organization, and they come up with some of
the most interesting stuff.../
-- http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htspace/articles/20090213.aspx
However, per the following link to a report on the results of its
first years of work, ISON data is analyzed at the Keldysh Institute of
Applied Mathematics of the Russian Academy of Sciences:
http://lfvn.astronomer.ru/report/0000029/index.htm
Ironically, they didn't detect the two satellites that collided.
Here's ISON's full page in English, for anyone interested:
http://lfvn.astronomer.ru/main/english.htm
Here is their news report page, with a summary of 2008 activities (via
Babelfish Russian-English translator, which leaves a lot to the
imagination, but there are some terrific pictures): http://preview.tinyurl.com/ajxsg3
The translator will work when you click on the link for "it is in more
detail." There's a lot of information in all the above links and I
haven't explored them in detail yet.
Barb
-
http://satobs.org/seesat/Oct-2010/0005.html
DSP F18 aperture cover orbit confirmed
This is the first independent discovery of a DSP aperture cover by our hobbyist group. ISON
(International Scientific Optical Network) had discovered three others, as of the end of 2009, one
of which has not been catalogued by USSTRATCOM.
Ted Molczan
-
http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3751
ZOOR
Tiger писал(а):
Кевин Феттер опубликовал на своём сайте 13-й выпуск ЕКА-шной классификации геостационарных объектов. Качать тут:
http://www.kfetter.com/EAS/ESAclassificationIssue13.pdf
А что что за контора Vladimir Agapov (KIAM) , товарищу из которой приносят Acknowledgements ?
-
Tiger
ZOOR писал(а):
А что что за контора Vladimir Agapov (KIAM) , товарищу из которой приносят Acknowledgements ?
http://lfvn.astronomer.ru/main/about_us.htm
Цитата:
Владимир АГАПОВ
(ИПМ им. М.В. Келдыша РАН и ОАО МАК "Вымпел")
Постановка задач, обработка, анализ и обобщение результатов
http://www.point.ru/news/stories/18549/
Цитата:
НСОИ является глобальной научной сетью, которая ведет наблюдения за высокими геоцентричными орбитами. Ученые следят за происходящем в околоземном пространстве с тем, чтобы иметь представление о количестве искусственных объектов находящегося там, большая часть из который - космический мусор.
С начала 2008 года сеть НСОИ объединяетпод своей эгидой 18 научных учреждений в различных странах мира, 18 обсерваторий, 25 телескопов и более 50 наблюдателей и исследователей.
В общем и целом, по данным НСОИ, сейчас в околоземном пространстве вращаются 152 неизвестных объекта, по которым не имеется открытой информации относительно их орбиты. Такая информация публикуется Сетью станций наблюдения за космическим пространством ВВС США в базе данных Space-Track. Кроме того, сотрудниками НСОИ обнаружены и в данный момент отслеживается 192 единицы ранее неизвестных мелких космических обломков, находящихся на геостационарной орбите.
"Таким образом, - отмечает Агапов, - деятельность НСОИ привела к тому, что количество космических объектов, находящихся на околоземной орбите известных общественности, выросло более чем на 35%, по сравнению с данными Space-Track".
-
ZOOR
Хорошая контора и нормальный товарищ :D